Human-Centered Design vs. Design Thinking Difference

Human-centered design and design thinking are two of the most influential approaches to problem-solving in modern business. Both put people at the center of the process, but they serve different purposes and work best in different contexts.

Here’s a fun way of thinking about it that might resonate a bit better: it’s like the difference between tuning a guitar and writing a song. Design thinking gives you a process for creating something new, while human-centered design ensures you're playing in a key your audience actually wants to hear.

Understanding when to use each approach, and how they complement one another, can help your team move from insight to action with greater clarity and speed. In this article, we'll break down the difference between human-centered design and design thinking, explore how they work together, and show how teams across sales, R&D, and product are applying these methods to align faster and execute with confidence.

Understanding human-centered design and design thinking

While these terms are often used interchangeably, they represent distinct approaches. Here's how to think about each one.

What is design thinking?

Design thinking is an iterative problem-solving process that balances user needs with technical feasibility and business viability. It typically follows five stages: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. The goal is to move quickly from understanding a problem to generating and validating potential solutions. Learn more in our guide to design thinking and AI evolution.

What makes design thinking powerful is its iterative nature. Teams can rapidly cycle through ideas, gather feedback, and refine their approach without waiting for perfect information. This makes it especially effective for exploring new territory and generating creative solutions.

What is human-centered design?

Human-centered design (HCD) is a methodology that keeps the people you're designing for at the center of every decision. Rather than a single process, it's a mindset and discipline that shapes how teams approach complex challenges, from product development to sales strategy to organizational change. For a deeper dive, explore our complete guide to human-centered design.

HCD emphasizes deep empathy and continuous engagement with the people affected by your work. It's not just about conducting research at the start of a project. It's about maintaining that human focus throughout execution and beyond. This makes it particularly valuable for complex, multi-stakeholder work where alignment and shared understanding are essential.

Human-centered design vs. design thinking: key differences

The difference between human-centered design and design thinking comes down to scope and application. Here's how to distinguish them:

Goal: Direction vs. exploration

Design thinking provides a structured process for exploring problems and generating solutions. It helps teams brainstorm, prototype, and test ideas quickly. Human-centered design provides direction by ensuring that every decision, from strategy to execution, remains grounded in real human needs and stakeholder priorities.

Think of it this way: design thinking helps you figure out what to build, while human-centered design ensures you're building it for the right reasons and the right people.

Focus: Problem-solving vs. alignment

Design thinking is problem-focused. It's designed to help teams move from ambiguity to clarity by working through defined stages. Human-centered design is alignment-focused. It creates shared understanding across teams, stakeholders, and functions so that everyone is working toward the same outcomes.

This distinction matters when you're working with multiple teams or navigating complex buying decisions. A sales team preparing for a strategic account, for example, benefits from human-centered approaches that map stakeholders and surface priorities before developing solutions. Take a look at human-centered design examples for real-world applications.

Application: Phases vs. discipline

Design thinking works in phases. You empathize, then define, then ideate, and so on. Each stage has clear activities and outputs. Human-centered design is a discipline that applies across phases. It informs how you conduct research, how you facilitate workshops, and how you make decisions at every step.

Many organizations find the greatest success by using design thinking as a process within a broader human-centered design discipline. This combination provides both structure and flexibility.

How human-centered design and design thinking work together

You don't have to choose between these approaches. In fact, they're most powerful when combined. Human-centered design sets the direction by aligning teams around real needs, priorities, and stakeholders. Design thinking fits within that approach by helping teams explore problems and iterate on solutions.

Consider a product team developing a new feature. Human-centered design ensures the team starts with deep understanding of user needs and maintains that focus throughout development. Design thinking provides the tactical process for brainstorming solutions, building prototypes, and testing with users. Together, they enable teams to move from shared understanding to action.

The LUMA System, a widely used human-centered design framework, offers a practical framework for this integration. Rather than a rigid process, LUMA provides 36 human-centered design methods organized around core skills: Looking (observing), Understanding (analyzing), and Making (envisioning). Teams can combine these methods into custom recipes that fit their specific challenges, whether that's stakeholder mapping for a complex sale or customer journey mapping for product development.

How visual collaboration supports human-centered design

Whether you're applying design thinking, human-centered design, or both, visual collaboration makes the work visible, shareable, and actionable. When teams can see their research, ideas, and decisions in one place, alignment happens faster and insights don't get lost in handoffs.

Visual collaboration platforms help teams capture customer insights, map stakeholder relationships, and document decisions in real time. With design thinking workshop templates, you don't have to start from scratch. You can jump straight into the work with structures that guide your process.

Mural's AI features accelerate this work further. AI-powered clustering helps synthesize large volumes of customer feedback, while AI-generated summaries make it easy to share key insights across teams. This combination of human-centered methods and AI-powered tools helps teams move from discovery to decision without losing the nuance that matters.

When to use each approach

Use design thinking when: You're exploring a new problem space, generating creative solutions, or need to rapidly prototype and test ideas. It's ideal for product development, service design, and innovation initiatives where you need to move quickly from concept to validation.

Use human-centered design when: You need alignment across multiple stakeholders, unclear priorities, or competing perspectives. It's especially valuable for complex B2B sales environments, cross-functional initiatives, and strategic planning where shared understanding is essential for execution.

Use both together when: You're tackling complex challenges that require both alignment and iteration. Human-centered design provides the foundation and direction, while design thinking provides the process for exploring solutions.

Ready to put human-centered design into practice? Sign up free and explore Mural's template library for every step of the design process.